PAWLY on Polygon vs Solana
PAWLY on Polygon and PAWLY PETS on Solana are independent projects with different tokens, creators and liquidity pools. They share the PAWLY name and ticker. The Solana token is not a migration, bridged version or predecessor of Polygon PAWLY.
Polygon PAWLY is a cultural meme token built around an original dog and attachment to Polygon, with its official home and analytics on POLTRACK. Solana PAWLY PETS describes a pet payments and charity ecosystem. The addresses below identify the two assets; a name, logo or price alone cannot do that. Polygon PAWLY, PAWLY PETS.
Polygon has the stronger distribution model for a publicly traded cultural token: its market allocation entered the pool at launch, the launch positions are locked permanently, and the remaining creator allocation is small and spread over seven years. Solana combines a small trading pool with much larger scheduled allocations outside it. Those locks are real, but their releases create a substantially larger supply overhang.
Published 7 October 2026. Figures are dated observations, not live quotes.

PAWLY on Polygon
POLTRACKPolygon PoS · chain ID 137
0x52D31361D78a00Dc94eFed09D1F4a12C23863054PAWLY on Solana
PAWLY PETSSolana mainnet
88cCF4cDTayhz36fWndgRfPfgVSLhNZe3ndYS8MdWn87Which PAWLY address do you have?
Paste a token contract or mint address to compare it with the two PAWLY tokens listed here.
The main differences
| Question | PAWLY on Polygon | PAWLY PETS on Solana |
|---|---|---|
| Network and token format | Polygon PoS, chain ID 137; ERC-20, 18 decimals | Solana mainnet; standard SPL Token, 6 decimals |
| Initial issuance | 10 billion PAWLY; 100 million burned before trading | 50 million PAWLY minted on 11 August 2026 |
| Supply observed on 7 October | 9,899,310,102.30 PAWLY | 50,000,000 PAWLY |
| Can more tokens be minted? | No callable mint path after deployment | Mint authority is revoked |
| Token freeze control | No token-admin freeze function | Freeze authority is absent |
| Pool launch | 20 September 2026; 9.7 billion PAWLY and 20,000 POL | 18 August 2026; 499,050 PAWLY and 504.184718 USDC |
| PAWLY currently in the identified pool | 9.516 billion, about 96.13% of current supply | 533,461.87, about 1.07% of current supply |
| Liquidity ownership | Three launch-position NFTs permanently held by a dedicated locker | About 99.5% of outstanding LP tokens in six dated Streamflow locks |
| Creator or team vesting | 200 million; seven years from 25 October 2026 | Two team-labeled Streamflow schedules ending in August 2029 |
| Burns and inscriptions | Native supply burns and Burn & Inscribe with permanent messages | SPL burning is supported; no dedicated inscription feature identified in the reviewed project materials |
Polygon figures use block 95,106,331, timestamp 7 October 2026, 09:18:02 UTC. Solana mint data use finalized slot 454,180,795; the pool vaults and token-account census use slots 454,182,680 and 454,182,797, retrieved between 09:28 and 09:29 UTC the same day. These observations are close in time, but not synchronized across chains. Polygon snapshot, Solana mint, saved research snapshot.
Different token counts and decimals do not rank the projects or establish which is cheaper. They are separate assets with separate markets.
Who launched Solana PAWLY and how
The mint was created on 11 August 2026 at 11:37:33 UTC by wallet ZqEk6F8…QYCiT. Two seconds later, that wallet minted all 50 million PAWLY into its own token account. At 11:47:22 UTC, it revoked the mint authority. The mint was initialized without a freeze authority. Mint creation, initial issuance, authority revocation.
The project's public channels include @pawlypetslover. Its on-chain metadata points to a token file under the GitHub namespace kentweney-netizen, which also appears in the official site's APK download link. The website's team section lists roles rather than a named founder. These public identifiers establish project accounts and technical wallets; they do not independently establish the legal identity of the individual who operated them. Project information, metadata account.
On 18 August 2026 at 07:43:06 UTC, a different wallet, 97VkQxP…r5ZV, created the Raydium CPMM PAWLY/USDC pool. The transaction deposited 499,050 PAWLY and 504.184718 USDC and minted LP receipts to that wallet. The pool's configured trading opening was 19 August at 02:00 UTC, later than the pool-creation transaction. Pool creation transaction, pool account.
This was a standard SPL mint followed by a directly created Raydium pool. The reviewed launch transactions do not show a Pump.fun bonding-curve launch. PAWLY PETS also states that same-name Pump.fun tokens are not its official asset. That statement does not make the independent Polygon project a counterfeit.
The first million-token allocation was not all deposited into the pool: 499,050 PAWLY went into Raydium, while the separate pawly LP1 3MONTH token escrow held 500,950 PAWLY, including its fee reserve. That Streamflow schedule ends on 15 November 2026. A token reserve intended for later liquidity remains outside the pool until someone actually pairs and deposits it. First-allocation escrow, its Streamflow schedule.
Where the Solana supply actually sits
The official allocation plan describes 60% for liquidity, 30% for staking and airdrops, 5% for early members and growth, and 5% for development and team. Those percentages describe intended allocations. They do not mean 60% of the supply has already been deposited into a trading pool. Published tokenomics.
The on-chain account census reconciled to the full 50 million PAWLY. It found 19 Streamflow escrow accounts holding 48,104,534.92 PAWLY, or 96.21% of supply. Matching those accounts to the Streamflow metadata gives this breakdown:
| Stream names | Escrow balance on 7 October | Scheduled endings in UTC |
|---|---|---|
Ten LP-labeled PAWLY allocation streams | 28,436,587.97 PAWLY | November 2026 to February 2031 |
Six staking-labeled streams | 14,806,835.84 PAWLY | December 2031 to June 2034 |
Two TEAM / DEV streams | 2,430,555.56 PAWLY | August 2029 |
One early member reward stream | 2,430,555.56 PAWLY | August 2029 |
These are PAWLY-token escrows, not the Raydium pool's LP receipts. Most of the large entries in the holder list are protocol accounts, rather than ordinary wallets with immediately spendable balances. An escrow balance can also include vested but unclaimed tokens and protocol fees; it should not automatically be labeled entirely unvested.
The decoded schedules have cancellation disabled for both sender and recipient, with pause and rate-change flags also disabled. Recipients can transfer their allocation rights to another recipient. The schedules have recurring releases from August 2026, except for the short first LP-allocation schedule. Their actual dates matter more than assuming that a roadmap stage is already complete. Separate recipient addresses also do not establish how many independent people control the allocations. Team schedule, LP-allocation schedule, staking-allocation schedule.
Outside those escrows, the identified pool held 533,461.87 PAWLY, and the pool-creator wallet held 1,332,786.65 PAWLY, about 2.67% of total supply. The remaining approximately 29,216.56 PAWLY were in other token accounts. This is an address-based accounting, not a claim that every wallet balance is offered for sale. Pool token vault, pool-creator token account.
Future releases and selling pressure
A fixed total supply does not mean a fixed amount available to trade. All 50 million Solana PAWLY already exist, and mint authority is revoked. The supply risk comes from existing allocations becoming claimable and transferable, rather than new tokens being created without a cap.
The escrow inventory is roughly 90 times the PAWLY balance in the identified pool. Releases span liquidity allocations, staking and airdrop rewards, early-member rewards and team allocations, with the longest schedules ending in 2034. Those holdings can become available to recipients over time. Some may be paired into liquidity, some distributed, and some sold; the contracts do not guarantee a buyer or require every released token to remain off the market. The ratio describes token inventory, not a forecast of sales or price impact.
The source of those tokens is known. The unresolved issue is how the market will absorb them. In particular, calling a reserve a liquidity allocation does not fund its other side: adding PAWLY to a PAWLY/USDC pool requires USDC as well. A vesting schedule delivers tokens, not matching dollars. Nor do labels such as staking or early-member reward establish who ultimately controls the recipient addresses or what recipients will do after claiming.
Polygon does not have this stack of deferred liquidity, staking, airdrop and early-member allocations. Its 9.7-billion market allocation was deposited at launch, while 200 million creator tokens, 2% of the original mint, vest over seven years. That creator allocation can still become sellable, and buyers can later sell tokens acquired from the pool. The distinction is a much smaller reserved allocation, rather than an absence of all selling pressure.
How much liquidity is in the pools
Polygon PAWLY launched its Genesis Pool with 9.7 billion PAWLY, 97% of the original 10 billion mint, and 20,000 POL. It put the market allocation into the pool at launch, alongside a separate 200-million creator vesting allocation. There was no presale or investor allocation. Polygon launch transaction, Genesis Pool explanation.
Solana's identified pool launched with 499,050 PAWLY, about 1% of its 50-million supply. On 7 October it held approximately 1.07%. Token-allocation vesting can release additional PAWLY to recipients over time; that does not automatically supply the USDC needed to pair it or deposit it into the pool.
| Pool reserve on 7 October | Polygon Genesis Pool | Solana Raydium pool |
|---|---|---|
| PAWLY token balance | 9,516,243,488.24 | 533,461.87 |
| Quote-asset balance | 53,175.16 WPOL | 2,764.17 USDC |
| Approximate quote-asset value | $5,444 at $0.102372 per POL | About $2,764 |
| PAWLY share of current total supply | 96.13% | 1.07% |
These are gross vault balances, including accrued fees, for the two identified pools. They do not establish that no other pool exists. GeckoTerminal's token-pool lookup returned one Solana pool at the time of this review. Polygon pool, Solana pool listing, USDC vault.
The token-allocation difference is large. The quote-reserve difference is roughly twofold in this snapshot. A headline pool valuation includes PAWLY itself at the current reference price, so it cannot be read as money available to sellers. Actual execution depends on trade size, fees, price impact and, for Polygon's Uniswap V3 pool, the active liquidity ranges. Reserve balances alone are not a slippage comparison.
What the pool sizes mean for liquidity risk
Solana PAWLY began with only $504.18 USDC against its token allocation. That was a very small launch reserve. By the 7 October snapshot it held $2,764.17 USDC: more than at launch, but still a small market against the large scheduled token inventory. The pool lookup found one trading pool for this mint at that time. That observation does not establish that another venue could never be created.
For scale, a $500 sale represents about 18% of the Solana pool's quoted USDC reserve. It cannot be treated as a $500 sale at an unchanged displayed price: AMM execution changes the reserve ratio and price as the trade progresses. LP locks prevent the locked receipts from being used to withdraw liquidity before their deadlines; they do not stop token holders selling into the pool and reducing its USDC reserve.
Polygon's Genesis Pool held 53,175.16 WPOL, about $5,444, and its launch positions have no withdrawal deadline or owner-controlled removal path. That is a stronger combination of quote backing and permanent position custody in this snapshot. There is no scheduled expiry at which the launch LP owner can reclaim those positions. Sellers can still take POL out through swaps, POL itself can change in dollar value, and active V3 liquidity ranges affect execution. The lock removes the owner's withdrawal mechanism; it does not freeze the reserve at 53,175 POL or eliminate trading risk.
Are the liquidity positions locked
Polygon's three launch-position NFTs are held by the permanent locker. Its code has no position withdrawal, liquidity-decrease or upgrade path. Fees can still be harvested, and the fee recipient and administrator can change. These remaining controls are visible in the liquidity dashboard.
For Solana, the LP mint is Eb8vGh4…wNad. The six verified Streamflow LP escrows held 99.50% of its outstanding receipts at finalized slot 454,182,968. Their metadata was separately checked on-chain:
| LP lock | Share of outstanding LP receipts | Scheduled unlock in UTC |
|---|---|---|
| Launch LP lock | 41.23% | 17 August 2027, 16:00 |
| Second LP lock | 11.51% | 31 August 2028, 01:00 |
| Third LP lock | 14.09% | 9 September 2028, 16:00 |
| Fourth LP lock | 3.82% | 16 September 2028, 16:00 |
| Fifth LP lock | 19.12% | 19 September 2028, 16:00 |
| Sixth LP lock | 9.73% | 19 September 2028, 16:00 |
All six have sender and recipient cancellation disabled, with pause, rate-change and recipient-transfer flags disabled. Approximately 0.50% of outstanding LP receipts were outside these six escrows. Five locks name the pool-creator wallet as recipient; one names another address. These are timed locks, with future withdrawal rights after their schedules, rather than Polygon's permanent launch-position lock. Streamflow lock mechanics.
Locking LP ownership protects against withdrawal under those ownership rights while the lock applies. It does not put the rest of the PAWLY supply into the pool or guarantee a stable market price.
Cultural identity and distribution through POLTRACK
Polygon PAWLY's own description is a cultural meme token for people who still believe in Polygon. The original dog gives it a recognizable character, while the Polygon connection gives that character a specific community. The proposition centers on identity, participation and lasting on-chain marks. It makes no claim of business revenue, staking yield or promised financial returns. Meet PAWLY.
Its launch also has an existing route to an audience: POLTRACK and Vadim's @vadim_web3 account. POLTRACK already serves people following Polygon and Polymarket, and brings PAWLY's introduction, contract verification, purchase route, tokenomics and burns into the same product. This gives distribution a home alongside tools people can use repeatedly, rather than relying entirely on a new token website and a launch-day trading chart. POLTRACK, buy PAWLY, token dashboard.
Two kinds of distribution should be kept separate. POLTRACK and the social account provide discovery and access; the Genesis Pool provides the actual market allocation. Exposure to an existing audience does not automatically make visitors holders, and purchases through POLTRACK acquire tokens from market liquidity rather than creating a new supply allocation. The advantage is an established channel and a verifiable route into the token, without a separate rewards emission needed to manufacture participation.
That makes PAWLY more specific than a generic animal meme with a ticker: an original Polygon character with permanent token mechanics and a visible home in an existing analytics product. Solana PAWLY PETS instead presents a pet payments and charity ecosystem, backed by staged liquidity, rewards and team allocations. These are different propositions as well as different contracts.
Why Polygon has stronger market tokenomics
For a cultural token, Polygon's combination of 97% initial pool allocation, permanent launch positions and seven-year creator vesting is materially cleaner than Solana's small initial pool and extensive deferred allocations. The Solana locks protect the schedules as written; they do not turn future releases into existing trading liquidity or remove the risk of those tokens reaching the market.
Polygon's creator allocation is 200 million PAWLY, 2% of the original mint. It releases linearly from 25 October 2026, 09:06:23 UTC to 25 October 2033, 09:06:23 UTC, to a fixed 2-of-3 Safe beneficiary. The vesting contract has no revocation, pause, upgrade or beneficiary-change path. Released tokens can subsequently be sold. Vesting contract, vesting dashboard.
Polygon PAWLY also has a working Burn & Inscribe feature: a native burn of at least 25,000 PAWLY can attach a permanent message of up to 280 UTF-8 bytes. The V1 inscription contract has no message-edit or upgrade path. Burning is voluntary and provides no reward. At the dated Polygon block, 689,897.70 PAWLY had been burned after market launch; the separate pre-market burn of 100 million is already excluded from the 9.9-billion launch supply. Inscription contract.
Solana's weaker point is the gap between its small present market and its much larger future distribution. Polygon places most supply in the public pool from the beginning and removes the launch owner's ability to withdraw the positions. Both tokens prohibit further issuance, so the meaningful advantage is distribution, custody and a smaller reserved allocation. Those are inspectable structural advantages, rather than a prediction of investment returns.
Sources and verification
The saved 7 October research snapshot includes the Solana mint and launch transactions, account balances, decoded pool fields, all 19 PAWLY Streamflow schedules and six LP locks, with request timestamps and finalized slots. Polygon data come from the dated POLTRACK tokenomics snapshot and linked verified contracts.
Solana account fields were decoded against the primary Raydium pool layout and Streamflow SDK layout. Project descriptions and allocation intentions come from PAWLY PETS. Token artwork is shown from POLTRACK's own PAWLY asset and the Solana mint's GeckoTerminal listing. This comparison is a dated review of specific assets and contracts, not a complete audit of every application or wallet associated with either project.
Frequently asked questions
Are PAWLY on Polygon and PAWLY on Solana the same token?
No. Polygon PAWLY is an independent POLTRACK project on Polygon PoS. PAWLY PETS is a separate Solana project. They share a name and ticker, but have different token addresses, issuers, supplies and pools.
What is the PAWLY contract address on Polygon?
The Polygon PoS PAWLY token address is 0x52D31361D78a00Dc94eFed09D1F4a12C23863054, on chain ID 137. Its official home is POLTRACK. Use the token contract address, rather than its pool, vesting or inscription address.
What is the PAWLY mint address on Solana?
The PAWLY PETS Solana mint is 88cCF4cDTayhz36fWndgRfPfgVSLhNZe3ndYS8MdWn87, also published by pawlypets.online. Solana addresses are case-sensitive. The Raydium pool address is a different account.
Did PAWLY migrate from Solana to Polygon?
No. Polygon PAWLY is not a migration or bridge of PAWLY PETS. Buying Polygon PAWLY with funds originating on another chain does not create an official PAWLY token on that source chain.
Does Solana PAWLY have liquidity and vesting locks?
Yes. The reviewed Raydium pool has real PAWLY and USDC balances, with about 99.5% of outstanding LP receipts in six timed Streamflow locks. Separately, 19 Streamflow escrows hold most of the PAWLY supply. Those token allocations are not already-deposited trading liquidity.
Can Solana PAWLY unlocks increase the amount available to sell?
Yes. Scheduled releases can make existing PAWLY available to recipients, who may distribute, provide liquidity with or sell those tokens. This is not additional minting: all 50 million tokens already exist. The 7 October snapshot found 96.21% in allocation escrows and 1.07% in the identified pool. It does not prove that every released token will be sold. Polygon instead has a 200-million creator allocation, 2% of its original mint, vesting over seven years alongside its upfront market allocation.
What makes Polygon PAWLY a cultural token?
It centers on an original dog and shared attachment to Polygon, with discovery through POLTRACK and its creator's social channel. Its Burn & Inscribe feature lets holders burn tokens to leave permanent on-chain messages. It has no promised utility, yield or financial returns; cultural participation is its stated purpose.
Why do websites show different PAWLY prices?
First check which token address and network the website tracks. These two PAWLY tokens have independent prices. For the same token, quote currencies, pools and observation times can also differ. A higher price per token does not by itself imply a larger or stronger project.
Does the address checker prove a token is safe?
No. It compares your input with the two token addresses listed on this page. It does not connect to a wallet, inspect your holdings or audit another contract. An unrecognized address can be a pool, a wallet or an entirely different asset.